Image

main image
Uploader cntrct,
Tags
Source Unknown
Locked No

Comments

- Reply
auds: ew
- Reply
lewd:
- Reply
lewd: nice
- Reply
_Cry_: EW?
- Reply
cntrct: just cause you jump on the anti-loli bandwagon, the general folks won't be any less grossed out by your zoophilic tendencies. Also, at least my art has some aesthetics to it, when it comes to pose, facial experession and the general vibe. Most of the furshit from your galleries is just disturbing and unpleasant - unless one has no sense for beauty or has some major mental illness. So yeah, thanks for commenting on my art and yiff in hell~
- Reply
auds: @cntrct: atleast we aint sexually attracted to children <3
ur art aint shit compared to mine. sure nice colors n shit but stop wasting it on actual child porn thats more disturbing than, FULL GROWN ANTHRO ADULT CHARACTERS!!! fucking dumbass
- Reply
auds: @cntrct: also theres no zoophilic tendacies, its fucking human """animals"" retard <3
- Reply
_Cry_: @cntrct:

Most of my pieces are intended to be disturbing, they tell a story or some of them are even just jokes.
furries are humanized animals, therefore arent zoophillic, and as something that is both humanized and also an adult, they can consent, unlike lolis.

I never insulted your art, as it isnt bad when it comes to skill.

Not liking lolicon isnt a hate bandwagon, people dont just jump on it to give you greif, theres legitimate concern when you are using your time to draw kids naked.
using your abilities to further push a harmful ideology that it is okay and normal to sexualize children ( whom again, cannot consent, therefore it is a form of abuse) real or just a drawing is a sick mindset.

I feel if you actually have sexual feelings towards minors/lolis/underaged characters that you should heavily consider seeking therapy and help before you end up causing harm to a child.
It isnt a joke, its not funny, it isnt hot.
Its illness.
Because something like that cant be undone.

Its people like you that go to hell, children should never be hurt.
- Reply
skadaddle: where is tomte when you need him
- Reply
skadaddle: youre both dumbasses holy shit. theyre animals. theyre kids. fuck off.
- Reply
pipicorn: tfw someone tells you its wrong to draw cp and you get angy bc you dont like being called a pedophile uwu
- Reply
pipicorn: @skadaddle: tomte is a retard
- Reply
pipicorn: @cntrct: kill yourself
- Reply
auds: @skadaddle: eat shot and die eboy
- Reply
cntrct: such autism, also tl;dr
- Reply
pipicorn: @cntrct: cringe
- Reply
_Cry_: @cntrct:
kid toucher
- Reply
cfdr: Most of my pieces are intended to be disturbing, they tell a story or some of them are even just jokes.
lolis are cartoony people, therefore arent pedophillic, and as something that is both humanized and also a drawing, they can't consent, like animals.

I never insulted your art, as it isnt bad when it comes to skill.

Not liking furry art isnt a hate bandwagon, people dont just jump on it to give you greif, theres legitimate concern when you are using your time to draw animals fucking.
using your abilities to further push a harmful ideology that it is okay and normal to sexualize animals ( whom again, cannot consent, therefore it is a form of abuse) real or just a drawing is a sick mindset.

I feel if you actually have sexual feelings towards animal/ferral characters that you should heavily consider seeking therapy and help before you end up causing harm to a dog.
It isnt a joke, its not funny, it isnt hot.
Its illness.
Because something like that cant be undone.

Its people like you that go to hell, animals should never be hurt.
- Reply
auds: @cfdr: woah ur so original babe <3 so cool
- Reply
pipicorn: @cfdr: give me your address ill make it long and painful <3
- Reply
_Cry_: @cfdr:
Anthros*
- Reply
skadaddle: Most of my pieces are intended to be disturbing, they tell a story or some of them are even just jokes.
lolis are cartoony people, therefore are pedophillic, also furries are cartoony animals, therefore are zoophillic, and as something that is both humanized and also a drawing, they can't consent. like children and animals.

I never insulted your art, but i will now as it utter dogshit when it comes to skill.

Not liking furry and loli images isnt a hate bandwagon, people dont just jump on it to give you greif, theres legitimate concern when you are using your time to draw animals and children fucking.
using your abilities to further push a harmful ideology that it is okay and normal to sexualize animals and children ( whom again, both cannot consent, therefore it is a form of abuse) real or just a drawing is a sick mindset.

I feel if you actually have sexual feelings towards animal/ferral and/or child/loli characters that you should heavily consider suicide and turning yourself into the authorities before you end up causing harm to an animal or child.
It isnt a joke, its not funny, it isnt hot.
Its illness.
Because something like that cant be undone.

Its people like you that go to hell, animals and children should never be hurt.
- Reply
auds: @skadaddle: stfu i bet you cant even draw
fucking cripple
- Reply
pipicorn: @skadaddle: go do your homework
- Reply
_Cry_: @skadaddle: consider making like your name
* anthros/furries arent animals
they are humanoids.

Not aligned in any way to getting off to little kids
i dont draw feral porn because im not sexually attracted to animals and am very against the
sexualization and harm of animals.

consider making your own argument instead of shuffling around some words like drawing two hairy adult people fucking is comparable to drawing a kid posing sexually
- Reply
skadaddle: @_Cry_: why do they look like animals if they arent? yes theyre humanoid in the sense that they are bipedal but they are still animals wtf. they have animal faces, animal fur, animal pussies and dicks etc. not being into feral doesnt negate the fact that you still find animal faces on bipedal bodies sexy. its like how atheists call themselves sceptics or like how pedos call themselves ephebeophiles. theyre the same thing but they just want to distance themselves for PR reasons.
- Reply
auds: @skadaddle: LMAOO THEY DONT EEVEN LOOK LIKE ANIMALS OMG
- Reply
pipicorn: @skadaddle: tfw retarded
- Reply
skadaddle: @auds: delusional. they have animal fur, animal skull shapes, animal ears, animal tails. theyre not humans. they're animals.
- Reply
auds: @skadaddle: okay what about loli catgirls idiot
- Reply
auds: @skadaddle: i dont think animals have human bodies soz babe
- Reply
skadaddle: @auds: i dont think humans have animal heads soz babe
- Reply
mywifesbush: loli catgirls are literally animals and human children combined, are you into both or what? why would you bring that up as a question??
- Reply
auds: @mywifesbush: catgirl lolis are even worse
why would i even be into that
also who tf are u
- Reply
mywifesbush: I'm me, my username. I assumed you liked it for bringing it up and since you like animals I just thought
- Reply
auds: @mywifesbush: i dont like animals, very against the thought and act of sexualizing animals. feral shit is different than shit on 2 legs (not the zootopia shit thats borderline zoophilia shit)
- Reply
auds: @auds: take a shot everytime i say shit
- Reply
mywifesbush: I'm confused then why is your gallery animal porn? they are stylised and are given human qualities but are still animals. You can't tell me it isn't sexualising animals also you're misusing the word feral.
- Reply
auds: @mywifesbush:you may consider them animals, but they arent, its sexualizing humanoids, like aliens or monsters n such
feral is ACTUAl animals. 4 legged mother fuckers
feral porn is disgusting.
- Reply
mywifesbush: long snouts and fluffy ears/tails and hind legs with fur usually will always be seen as furry shit/animals it's the truth. humanoid is another term to say it has human qualities means nothing, the monster thing I can kinda believe though. Feral has a whole different definition, I suppose I don't know these disgusting porn sub-genres like you(((no offense))).
- Reply
auds: @mywifesbush: people will think what they think, there ARE furries that fuck animals. i am not one of them, they do exist and they should burn in hell, same with loli pedo shit. its hard to explain. i rather have my "furry" characters more human than ugly zootopia furries
- Reply
mywifesbush: you should explain we're over 30 comments in. I'm not even talking about zhitopia, its about how you are both in same group only if you're a furry and doesn't do animals IRL that is, which you seem to be communicating.
- Reply
auds: @mywifesbush: are you saying all furries are zoophiles? i dont really like calling myself a "furry" due to shit like this, i only draw "furries" bc its easier for me, if humans were easier id do that more, but its not. its also kinda a stylistic choice, but maybe you could consider drawing children that? idk. im done with this convo for now bc its getting no where at this point lol
- Reply
mywifesbush: furries tend to be into zoo shit yes. anyway next time don't spam over 10 images of autism on the gallery.
- Reply
pipicorn: @mywifesbush: *makes fun of shitty pedo art cutely*
- Reply
cntrct: @cfdr I'm only against retarded furries like auds and _cry, not in general :3 it's just art and personal taste. But if furries try to harass me or my art because it's "pedophilic", when it's anime characters of unclassified physical and mental age, intellect, etc. then I'll call them/their art out for being zoophilic, since it's the same line of argument used against loli-/shotacons as well as furries/bronies.

@_cry_ i'm as much a kid toucher as you're a dog fucker
- Reply
cntrct: *facepalm* im only barely scanning through the posts, didn't realize you just posted copypasta lel @cfdr
- Reply
pipicorn: @cntrct: being a pedophile isnt personal taste, dipshit. Kill yourself <3
- Reply
pipicorn: @cntrct: "unclassified physical and mental age" you literally draw characters that look like 8 year olds. You're in denial bb
- Reply
ad0lf: @pipicorn:
being a lolicon is ok, we dont touch real kids c:

https://flockmod.com/gallery/index.php?q=/post/view/934964#search=user_id%3D107515
what you save cant even be called "art" thou haha, at least cntrcts lolis are cute and his art is rly good. urs is just gross with 0 beauty in it
- Reply
auds: @ad0lf: hey retard its called joke art, plus the drawing next to the "joke" art is better than what you could fucking do
- Reply
ad0lf: @auds: im not talking about what is next to pipis drawing, whoever made that one has skills i will admit. pipis art is shit thou

https://flockmod.com/gallery/index.php?q=/post/view/934989 this is a lot of effort for "joke art" and its just some hairy old man hahahaha. cntrcts art has a thousand times more value and skill than anything youve made
- Reply
auds: @ad0lf: omg babe ur so nice <3 i bet you cant draw shit. so shut the fuck up <3
- Reply
ad0lf: @auds: yea i dont draw gud, doesnt change the fact that cntrcts art is much better than the ones complaining ;DDD
- Reply
auds: @ad0lf: i never said cntrcts art is bad, its actually good but its wasted on lolis. its also ur own damn opinion if im "bad" or not. but thanks for ur time and good bye <3
- Reply
ad0lf: @auds: whether art is bad or good isnt an "opinion" its just evaluation of skill, yours just has 0 value :/
lolis are much better than furries because they are at least the same species + actually cute and not disgusting xD
- Reply
auds: @ad0lf: your opinion isnt vaild bc u cant draw <3
- Reply
ad0lf: @auds: ability to draw=/= ability to criticize, you can tell good apart from bad without having to be able emulate what you see
- Reply
skadaddle: @ad0lf:
you wouldnt have survived under adolf's regime. lolicons are pedos idgaf if you're 'dont act on it'
@auds:
this isnt joke art it's like disgust porn. also you're a zoophile furfag idgaf if you're 'dont act on it'
- Reply
_Cry_: @skadaddle:
several comments in and you still cannot wrap your head around it

anthros are humanoid whether youd like to think so or not
as the body is built in a humanoid way and they are sentient which means they can think for themselves attraction to them is the attraction to something that isnt even real in the first place
and to add to that i dont see/havent seen anyone on the website that draws them underage

zoophiles are attracted to FERAL animals
animals that are not sentient and cannot consent and are built like, well animals.
a feral animal is what most people consider an animal and they are real

you can be a zoophile without being a furry
You can be a furry without being a zoophile
the two dont correlate and the quicker you learn that the better you can know what to actually fucking worry about and condemn when you spot people online
please consider looking more into the difference between the two so if you do need to point it out you have a better idea of what you are looking for

to you an anthro classifies as an animal and that lines different for everyone depending on the anatomy
however tossing the word zoophile is a serious accusation esp considering the fact it doesnt correlate with being a furry at all
to break it to you statistically most zoophiles arent even furries and dont care for anthro animals period

while porn or suggestive themes of lolis, literal children ( not just lolis on their own)
can and always correlate with pedophilic tendancies
and while it may be a drawing of a child its still a child
theres no way to interpenetrate it differently

and even though the age of the characters arent specified the traits are too consistent between numerous different characters and its not a consistent character thats confirmed of age being routinely drawn so the assumption that its underage is a safe one

consider ending this thread however because its become obnoxious at this point and its a circle jerk of the same arguments people refuse to hear out

lolis are pedophilic
and i dont really wanna see someone my siblings fucking age ass naked on the gallery of a website because someone cant keep their sick kid fantasies to themselves

thats all that was meant to be stated here
- Reply
skadaddle: @_Cry_:
humanoid: meaning not fully human therefore not of the human species therefor furries are animals.
kerothewolf and many other furries are into animals because being into animal traits makes you a zoophile and if you werent a zoophile you wouldn't be a furfag to begin with. cope, seethe, dilate, and yiff in hell furfags.
- Reply
_Cry_: @skadaddle:
ok retard
- Reply
ad0lf: @skadaddle: my name is adolf irl im not that other adolf xD we dont like real children thou just lolis c:

@_Cry_: there is no such thing as consent when it comes to a drawing, its not real -.-
furries are literal freaks of nature thou, very hypocritical to pretend to be morally superior when you are pure filth irl ;D
- Reply
_Cry_: @ad0lf
Is lolicon (loli) illegal in the United States? ... Loli is illegal under the federal PROTECT Act, so long as the anime is obscene and depicts an identifiable minor engaging in sexual conduct. It can violate child pornography laws in some states, as well.