cntrct: just cause you jump on the anti-loli bandwagon, the general folks won't be any less grossed out by your zoophilic tendencies. Also, at least my art has some aesthetics to it, when it comes to pose, facial experession and the general vibe. Most of the furshit from your galleries is just disturbing and unpleasant - unless one has no sense for beauty or has some major mental illness. So yeah, thanks for commenting on my art and yiff in hell~
auds: @cntrct: atleast we aint sexually attracted to children <3
ur art aint shit compared to mine. sure nice colors n shit but stop wasting it on actual child porn thats more disturbing than, FULL GROWN ANTHRO ADULT CHARACTERS!!! fucking dumbass
Most of my pieces are intended to be disturbing, they tell a story or some of them are even just jokes.
furries are humanized animals, therefore arent zoophillic, and as something that is both humanized and also an adult, they can consent, unlike lolis.
I never insulted your art, as it isnt bad when it comes to skill.
Not liking lolicon isnt a hate bandwagon, people dont just jump on it to give you greif, theres legitimate concern when you are using your time to draw kids naked.
using your abilities to further push a harmful ideology that it is okay and normal to sexualize children ( whom again, cannot consent, therefore it is a form of abuse) real or just a drawing is a sick mindset.
I feel if you actually have sexual feelings towards minors/lolis/underaged characters that you should heavily consider seeking therapy and help before you end up causing harm to a child.
It isnt a joke, its not funny, it isnt hot.
Its illness.
Because something like that cant be undone.
Its people like you that go to hell, children should never be hurt.
cfdr: Most of my pieces are intended to be disturbing, they tell a story or some of them are even just jokes.
lolis are cartoony people, therefore arent pedophillic, and as something that is both humanized and also a drawing, they can't consent, like animals.
I never insulted your art, as it isnt bad when it comes to skill.
Not liking furry art isnt a hate bandwagon, people dont just jump on it to give you greif, theres legitimate concern when you are using your time to draw animals fucking.
using your abilities to further push a harmful ideology that it is okay and normal to sexualize animals ( whom again, cannot consent, therefore it is a form of abuse) real or just a drawing is a sick mindset.
I feel if you actually have sexual feelings towards animal/ferral characters that you should heavily consider seeking therapy and help before you end up causing harm to a dog.
It isnt a joke, its not funny, it isnt hot.
Its illness.
Because something like that cant be undone.
Its people like you that go to hell, animals should never be hurt.
skadaddle: Most of my pieces are intended to be disturbing, they tell a story or some of them are even just jokes.
lolis are cartoony people, therefore are pedophillic, also furries are cartoony animals, therefore are zoophillic, and as something that is both humanized and also a drawing, they can't consent. like children and animals.
I never insulted your art, but i will now as it utter dogshit when it comes to skill.
Not liking furry and loli images isnt a hate bandwagon, people dont just jump on it to give you greif, theres legitimate concern when you are using your time to draw animals and children fucking.
using your abilities to further push a harmful ideology that it is okay and normal to sexualize animals and children ( whom again, both cannot consent, therefore it is a form of abuse) real or just a drawing is a sick mindset.
I feel if you actually have sexual feelings towards animal/ferral and/or child/loli characters that you should heavily consider suicide and turning yourself into the authorities before you end up causing harm to an animal or child.
It isnt a joke, its not funny, it isnt hot.
Its illness.
Because something like that cant be undone.
Its people like you that go to hell, animals and children should never be hurt.
_Cry_: @skadaddle: consider making like your name
* anthros/furries arent animals
they are humanoids.
Not aligned in any way to getting off to little kids
i dont draw feral porn because im not sexually attracted to animals and am very against the
sexualization and harm of animals.
consider making your own argument instead of shuffling around some words like drawing two hairy adult people fucking is comparable to drawing a kid posing sexually
skadaddle: @_Cry_: why do they look like animals if they arent? yes theyre humanoid in the sense that they are bipedal but they are still animals wtf. they have animal faces, animal fur, animal pussies and dicks etc. not being into feral doesnt negate the fact that you still find animal faces on bipedal bodies sexy. its like how atheists call themselves sceptics or like how pedos call themselves ephebeophiles. theyre the same thing but they just want to distance themselves for PR reasons.
auds: @mywifesbush: i dont like animals, very against the thought and act of sexualizing animals. feral shit is different than shit on 2 legs (not the zootopia shit thats borderline zoophilia shit)
mywifesbush: I'm confused then why is your gallery animal porn? they are stylised and are given human qualities but are still animals. You can't tell me it isn't sexualising animals also you're misusing the word feral.
auds: @mywifesbush:you may consider them animals, but they arent, its sexualizing humanoids, like aliens or monsters n such
feral is ACTUAl animals. 4 legged mother fuckers
feral porn is disgusting.
mywifesbush: long snouts and fluffy ears/tails and hind legs with fur usually will always be seen as furry shit/animals it's the truth. humanoid is another term to say it has human qualities means nothing, the monster thing I can kinda believe though. Feral has a whole different definition, I suppose I don't know these disgusting porn sub-genres like you(((no offense))).
auds: @mywifesbush: people will think what they think, there ARE furries that fuck animals. i am not one of them, they do exist and they should burn in hell, same with loli pedo shit. its hard to explain. i rather have my "furry" characters more human than ugly zootopia furries
mywifesbush: you should explain we're over 30 comments in. I'm not even talking about zhitopia, its about how you are both in same group only if you're a furry and doesn't do animals IRL that is, which you seem to be communicating.
auds: @mywifesbush: are you saying all furries are zoophiles? i dont really like calling myself a "furry" due to shit like this, i only draw "furries" bc its easier for me, if humans were easier id do that more, but its not. its also kinda a stylistic choice, but maybe you could consider drawing children that? idk. im done with this convo for now bc its getting no where at this point lol
cntrct: @cfdr I'm only against retarded furries like auds and _cry, not in general :3 it's just art and personal taste. But if furries try to harass me or my art because it's "pedophilic", when it's anime characters of unclassified physical and mental age, intellect, etc. then I'll call them/their art out for being zoophilic, since it's the same line of argument used against loli-/shotacons as well as furries/bronies.
@_cry_ i'm as much a kid toucher as you're a dog fucker
ad0lf: @pipicorn:
being a lolicon is ok, we dont touch real kids c:
https://flockmod.com/gallery/index.php?q=/post/view/934964#search=user_id%3D107515
what you save cant even be called "art" thou haha, at least cntrcts lolis are cute and his art is rly good. urs is just gross with 0 beauty in it
ad0lf: @auds: im not talking about what is next to pipis drawing, whoever made that one has skills i will admit. pipis art is shit thou
https://flockmod.com/gallery/index.php?q=/post/view/934989 this is a lot of effort for "joke art" and its just some hairy old man hahahaha. cntrcts art has a thousand times more value and skill than anything youve made
auds: @ad0lf: i never said cntrcts art is bad, its actually good but its wasted on lolis. its also ur own damn opinion if im "bad" or not. but thanks for ur time and good bye <3
ad0lf: @auds: whether art is bad or good isnt an "opinion" its just evaluation of skill, yours just has 0 value :/
lolis are much better than furries because they are at least the same species + actually cute and not disgusting xD
skadaddle: @ad0lf:
you wouldnt have survived under adolf's regime. lolicons are pedos idgaf if you're 'dont act on it'
@auds:
this isnt joke art it's like disgust porn. also you're a zoophile furfag idgaf if you're 'dont act on it'
_Cry_: @skadaddle:
several comments in and you still cannot wrap your head around it
anthros are humanoid whether youd like to think so or not
as the body is built in a humanoid way and they are sentient which means they can think for themselves attraction to them is the attraction to something that isnt even real in the first place
and to add to that i dont see/havent seen anyone on the website that draws them underage
zoophiles are attracted to FERAL animals
animals that are not sentient and cannot consent and are built like, well animals.
a feral animal is what most people consider an animal and they are real
you can be a zoophile without being a furry
You can be a furry without being a zoophile
the two dont correlate and the quicker you learn that the better you can know what to actually fucking worry about and condemn when you spot people online
please consider looking more into the difference between the two so if you do need to point it out you have a better idea of what you are looking for
to you an anthro classifies as an animal and that lines different for everyone depending on the anatomy
however tossing the word zoophile is a serious accusation esp considering the fact it doesnt correlate with being a furry at all
to break it to you statistically most zoophiles arent even furries and dont care for anthro animals period
while porn or suggestive themes of lolis, literal children ( not just lolis on their own)
can and always correlate with pedophilic tendancies
and while it may be a drawing of a child its still a child
theres no way to interpenetrate it differently
and even though the age of the characters arent specified the traits are too consistent between numerous different characters and its not a consistent character thats confirmed of age being routinely drawn so the assumption that its underage is a safe one
consider ending this thread however because its become obnoxious at this point and its a circle jerk of the same arguments people refuse to hear out
lolis are pedophilic
and i dont really wanna see someone my siblings fucking age ass naked on the gallery of a website because someone cant keep their sick kid fantasies to themselves
skadaddle: @_Cry_:
humanoid: meaning not fully human therefore not of the human species therefor furries are animals.
kerothewolf and many other furries are into animals because being into animal traits makes you a zoophile and if you werent a zoophile you wouldn't be a furfag to begin with. cope, seethe, dilate, and yiff in hell furfags.
ad0lf: @skadaddle: my name is adolf irl im not that other adolf xD we dont like real children thou just lolis c:
@_Cry_: there is no such thing as consent when it comes to a drawing, its not real -.-
furries are literal freaks of nature thou, very hypocritical to pretend to be morally superior when you are pure filth irl ;D
_Cry_: @ad0lf
Is lolicon (loli) illegal in the United States? ... Loli is illegal under the federal PROTECT Act, so long as the anime is obscene and depicts an identifiable minor engaging in sexual conduct. It can violate child pornography laws in some states, as well.
ad0lf: @_Cry_: its not illegal where i live, legal or nor doesnt matter thou, wont change the fact that furries are freaks.
but you trying to seek moral superiority in legal systems that varies from country to country is pathetic cause you cant even tell right from wrong without relying on external systems :/
its obv that furries are zoophilic thou, youre attracted to animalistic features which rly just shows what a defective human being you are, not even attracted to your own species
the etiquette rules on the site specify that its not allowed if its illegal in the USA
i dont give a fuck what country you are from
the rules on the website are based in the US.
also yes i am attracted to humans
just adult ones though :)
defective as a person myself or not, oppinion from someone who sexualized the literal innocence of childhood is worth nothing
@_cry_
> so the assumption that its underage is a safe one
no. it's your assumption. anime != real world to me and anime lolis don't have anything in common with real children in my imagination
>and i dont really wanna see someone my siblings fucking age ass naked on the gallery of a website because someone cant keep their sick kid fantasies to themselves
well too bad for you, since i don't give a fuck. I even feel more encouraged to upload my shit here with stupid whiny haters like you complaining about it
pipicorn: @cntrct:
"in my imagination" yea only in your fucked imagination you dont wanna admit you wanna fuck children. Your mom probably keeps you away from your siblings lmfao if what you draw is normal then you should have no problem showing mommy huh? (assuming she doesnt know you're a pedophile yet)
cntrct: @pipicorn you're a piece of shit tbh. I'd rather be a pedo than someone even remotely similar to you. Ppl that can't keep their mind from thinking about sexualized children when watching cartoons are more scary than anything coming from an artists imagination
kinky: The first time I saw you I couldn't take my eyes off you. In school I was always there for you when assholes you dated treated you with 1% of the respect I have for you in 1% of my heart alone. I always offered to pay for your lunch even when you were dating other guys. When you wanted to go out because an asshole had broke up with you and you needed to take your mind off it and I was busy I made time for you, but I also respected you when you were busy. In tenth grade when I masturbated for the first time I didn't think of pornstars like other guys but I thought of you. At prom you were the only one I wanted to take but you went with a douche who had asked another girl before you. That's the reason I didn't go because I couldn't go with you. I never told you this before but you've gone as far as you need to with all the assholes you date. I'll be the last guy you ever date. Because we will never break up. A brother wouldn't do any of this but that's what you call me?!?!?!?!
Comments
ur art aint shit compared to mine. sure nice colors n shit but stop wasting it on actual child porn thats more disturbing than, FULL GROWN ANTHRO ADULT CHARACTERS!!! fucking dumbass
Most of my pieces are intended to be disturbing, they tell a story or some of them are even just jokes.
furries are humanized animals, therefore arent zoophillic, and as something that is both humanized and also an adult, they can consent, unlike lolis.
I never insulted your art, as it isnt bad when it comes to skill.
Not liking lolicon isnt a hate bandwagon, people dont just jump on it to give you greif, theres legitimate concern when you are using your time to draw kids naked.
using your abilities to further push a harmful ideology that it is okay and normal to sexualize children ( whom again, cannot consent, therefore it is a form of abuse) real or just a drawing is a sick mindset.
I feel if you actually have sexual feelings towards minors/lolis/underaged characters that you should heavily consider seeking therapy and help before you end up causing harm to a child.
It isnt a joke, its not funny, it isnt hot.
Its illness.
Because something like that cant be undone.
Its people like you that go to hell, children should never be hurt.
kid toucher
lolis are cartoony people, therefore arent pedophillic, and as something that is both humanized and also a drawing, they can't consent, like animals.
I never insulted your art, as it isnt bad when it comes to skill.
Not liking furry art isnt a hate bandwagon, people dont just jump on it to give you greif, theres legitimate concern when you are using your time to draw animals fucking.
using your abilities to further push a harmful ideology that it is okay and normal to sexualize animals ( whom again, cannot consent, therefore it is a form of abuse) real or just a drawing is a sick mindset.
I feel if you actually have sexual feelings towards animal/ferral characters that you should heavily consider seeking therapy and help before you end up causing harm to a dog.
It isnt a joke, its not funny, it isnt hot.
Its illness.
Because something like that cant be undone.
Its people like you that go to hell, animals should never be hurt.
Anthros*
lolis are cartoony people, therefore are pedophillic, also furries are cartoony animals, therefore are zoophillic, and as something that is both humanized and also a drawing, they can't consent. like children and animals.
I never insulted your art, but i will now as it utter dogshit when it comes to skill.
Not liking furry and loli images isnt a hate bandwagon, people dont just jump on it to give you greif, theres legitimate concern when you are using your time to draw animals and children fucking.
using your abilities to further push a harmful ideology that it is okay and normal to sexualize animals and children ( whom again, both cannot consent, therefore it is a form of abuse) real or just a drawing is a sick mindset.
I feel if you actually have sexual feelings towards animal/ferral and/or child/loli characters that you should heavily consider suicide and turning yourself into the authorities before you end up causing harm to an animal or child.
It isnt a joke, its not funny, it isnt hot.
Its illness.
Because something like that cant be undone.
Its people like you that go to hell, animals and children should never be hurt.
fucking cripple
* anthros/furries arent animals
they are humanoids.
Not aligned in any way to getting off to little kids
i dont draw feral porn because im not sexually attracted to animals and am very against the
sexualization and harm of animals.
consider making your own argument instead of shuffling around some words like drawing two hairy adult people fucking is comparable to drawing a kid posing sexually
why would i even be into that
also who tf are u
feral is ACTUAl animals. 4 legged mother fuckers
feral porn is disgusting.
@_cry_ i'm as much a kid toucher as you're a dog fucker
being a lolicon is ok, we dont touch real kids c:
https://flockmod.com/gallery/index.php?q=/post/view/934964#search=user_id%3D107515
what you save cant even be called "art" thou haha, at least cntrcts lolis are cute and his art is rly good. urs is just gross with 0 beauty in it
https://flockmod.com/gallery/index.php?q=/post/view/934989 this is a lot of effort for "joke art" and its just some hairy old man hahahaha. cntrcts art has a thousand times more value and skill than anything youve made
lolis are much better than furries because they are at least the same species + actually cute and not disgusting xD
you wouldnt have survived under adolf's regime. lolicons are pedos idgaf if you're 'dont act on it'
@auds:
this isnt joke art it's like disgust porn. also you're a zoophile furfag idgaf if you're 'dont act on it'
several comments in and you still cannot wrap your head around it
anthros are humanoid whether youd like to think so or not
as the body is built in a humanoid way and they are sentient which means they can think for themselves attraction to them is the attraction to something that isnt even real in the first place
and to add to that i dont see/havent seen anyone on the website that draws them underage
zoophiles are attracted to FERAL animals
animals that are not sentient and cannot consent and are built like, well animals.
a feral animal is what most people consider an animal and they are real
you can be a zoophile without being a furry
You can be a furry without being a zoophile
the two dont correlate and the quicker you learn that the better you can know what to actually fucking worry about and condemn when you spot people online
please consider looking more into the difference between the two so if you do need to point it out you have a better idea of what you are looking for
to you an anthro classifies as an animal and that lines different for everyone depending on the anatomy
however tossing the word zoophile is a serious accusation esp considering the fact it doesnt correlate with being a furry at all
to break it to you statistically most zoophiles arent even furries and dont care for anthro animals period
while porn or suggestive themes of lolis, literal children ( not just lolis on their own)
can and always correlate with pedophilic tendancies
and while it may be a drawing of a child its still a child
theres no way to interpenetrate it differently
and even though the age of the characters arent specified the traits are too consistent between numerous different characters and its not a consistent character thats confirmed of age being routinely drawn so the assumption that its underage is a safe one
consider ending this thread however because its become obnoxious at this point and its a circle jerk of the same arguments people refuse to hear out
lolis are pedophilic
and i dont really wanna see someone my siblings fucking age ass naked on the gallery of a website because someone cant keep their sick kid fantasies to themselves
thats all that was meant to be stated here
humanoid: meaning not fully human therefore not of the human species therefor furries are animals.
kerothewolf and many other furries are into animals because being into animal traits makes you a zoophile and if you werent a zoophile you wouldn't be a furfag to begin with. cope, seethe, dilate, and yiff in hell furfags.
ok retard
@_Cry_: there is no such thing as consent when it comes to a drawing, its not real -.-
furries are literal freaks of nature thou, very hypocritical to pretend to be morally superior when you are pure filth irl ;D
Is lolicon (loli) illegal in the United States? ... Loli is illegal under the federal PROTECT Act, so long as the anime is obscene and depicts an identifiable minor engaging in sexual conduct. It can violate child pornography laws in some states, as well.
but you trying to seek moral superiority in legal systems that varies from country to country is pathetic cause you cant even tell right from wrong without relying on external systems :/
its obv that furries are zoophilic thou, youre attracted to animalistic features which rly just shows what a defective human being you are, not even attracted to your own species
the etiquette rules on the site specify that its not allowed if its illegal in the USA
i dont give a fuck what country you are from
the rules on the website are based in the US.
also yes i am attracted to humans
just adult ones though :)
defective as a person myself or not, oppinion from someone who sexualized the literal innocence of childhood is worth nothing
seek therapy
@_cry_
> so the assumption that its underage is a safe one
no. it's your assumption. anime != real world to me and anime lolis don't have anything in common with real children in my imagination
>and i dont really wanna see someone my siblings fucking age ass naked on the gallery of a website because someone cant keep their sick kid fantasies to themselves
well too bad for you, since i don't give a fuck. I even feel more encouraged to upload my shit here with stupid whiny haters like you complaining about it
"in my imagination" yea only in your fucked imagination you dont wanna admit you wanna fuck children. Your mom probably keeps you away from your siblings lmfao if what you draw is normal then you should have no problem showing mommy huh? (assuming she doesnt know you're a pedophile yet)